|
|
|
To:
Dr. Rosemary Allen From:
Grover Hibberd Re:
Annual Report To Faculty Date:
April 18, 2000 As
in almost all administrative areas of Georgetown College, this was a year of
budget cuts. During the
preparation for the current year’s budget, requests for computer upgrades
through expired computer leases were denied, resulting in only a few computer
upgrades for faculty. In
addition, the original budget created for 1999/2000 was reduced by $64,000.
This reduction will result in no upgrades being made to our campus
network, or application file servers. Georgetown
College has basically the same network that was installed in 1996, with the
exception of one 100 Mb segment between the LRC and Giddings.*
Since then, the number of computers supported by our network has grown
from 500 to 1,000 and each new semester brings more students with computers to
campus. Our current computing
infrastructure consists of the following: ·
10 Mb
Ethernet network to all administrative, academic, and resident halls * ·
9 NT
servers (applications, network, web servers, logon authentication, etc.) ·
3 HP-UX
servers (CARS, Tiger, and G-Card) ·
Approximately
400 institutional pc’s (100 faculty, 200 LRC and labs, and 100 staff) ·
CARS
software support (product maintenance) ·
Microsoft
campus agreement ·
Internet
access via a T-1 (1.5 Mb) link (supporting 1,000 computers) The
danger of postponing upgrades in our environment is in the cumulative effect
of the eventual obsolescence of the infrastructure. The budget proposed for the year 2000/2001 calls for a cut of
$30,000 from the 1999/2000 original budget (prior to the $64,000 reduction).
I foresee another year of very few computers being distributed to
faculty and staff, and little to no upgrades to the network or application
file servers. I understand the
need to do whatever it takes to balance the budget, but I feel it is important
to understand future budget ramifications of deferred maintenance to the
technology infrastructure. In two
years, Georgetown College will need to upgrade all areas mentioned above at
the same time, or in a relatively short period of time.
This is not an attempt to scare anyone, but to help everyone understand
the impact of deferred maintenance to the technology infrastructure. Attached
are two reports (John Jones and Andrea
Peach) concerning support to academics during the 1999/2000 academic year.
Despite the reductions in the ITS budget significant accomplishments
were achieved. |