|
| Border States: Journal of the Kentucky-Tennessee American Studies Association, No. 11 (1997) |
In the southwest corner of Legislative Plaza, overlooking the
Tennessee Vietnam Memorial Wall and Sculpture, downtown Nashville,
there is a bronze sculpture with three forms -- a large female
figure holding smaller male and female figures in her lap. This
enigmatic monument is the Tennessee Monument to the Women of the
Confederacy and its simple plaque reads:
Erected by the State of Tennessee to commemorate the heroic action of the women of Tennessee during the War Between the States. Dedicated October 10, 1926, Belle Kinney Sculptor. Plaque placed by the Tennessee Historical Commission.
Behind this public attempt to honor the role of the women of the
South in the Civil War lies a surprising series of controversies
and ironies. A look at this debate will illustrate the processes
and issues involved in the interactions between collective memory
and public commemoration. What is being commemorated, how something
is best remembered and whose version of collective memory will
be used are all problematic issues. Any memorial is more a reflection
of the group and era in which it is constructed than it is of
the history it commemorates.
The collective memory of a group is their history as they remember
and interpret it. What becomes crucial is not the reality of
history, but the perception of reality by the group. Historian
David Thelen states, "People depend on others to help them
decide which experiences to forget and which to remember and what
interpretation to place on that experience. People develop a
shared identity by identifying, exploring, and agreeing on memories."1
Collective Memory is more than an aggregate of shared recollections
in that it is decidedly selective. Identifying the experiences
that a group chooses to forget will reveal as much about that
group as identifying what it remembers. A group's collective
memory does not reproduce history but, rather, reconstructs it.
Thelen states, "In each construction of a memory, people
reshape, omit, destroy, combine and reorganize details from the
past in an active and subjective way. They mix pieces from the
present with elements of the past."2 In other
words, their collective memory interprets the past in such a way
that the needs of the present are fulfilled.
After the Civil War, Southerners who were faced with total disruption
of their economic, political, and social system coped by creating
their own interpretation of the war and those who fought it.
This was, of course, the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. In their
memories, many Southerners looked back to the years before the
war as a golden agrarian period peopled by aristocratic planter
families and their contented slaves. The war had been fought
valiantly to preserve this way of life which was culturally and
spiritually superior to that of the industrailizing North. The
ideologies which had caused such bitter debate about slavery and
secession faded from both nation and southern consciousness as
the nation celebrated reunion.3
Reconciliation was further enhanced as the collective memory of
the South downplayed the outcome of the war and celebrated the
bravery and nobility of those who had fought in it. Thus, they
could become heroes in a land which celebrated victory. The cost
of the war in human life was enormous. It is estimated that as
many as a million men had served in the Confederate aries, of
whom 250,000 died and another 150,000 became disabled.4
Southern women had played a significant role in the war effort
as they nursed the troops, clothed the soldiers, and formed soldiers'
aid societies, at the same time that they ran farms and businesses.
After the war, the southern woman was praised not only for her
grace and gentility, but also for her strength and determination.
She, too, was a survivor.
Confederate memorial associations were formed immediately after
the war to aid needy veterans and their widows, to celebrate the
heroism of local military units, and to erect public monuments
to the valiant fighters of the South.5 Almost seventy
percent of the public monuments were placed in cemeteries immediately
after the war, reflecting the need to signify the sense of loss
felt by the survivors.6 But as the turn of the century
approached, the glorification of the Lost Cause, coupled with
efforts to impart this collective memory to a younger generation,
led to the erection of monuments in courthouse squares and public
parks.
The role of southern women in shaping the collective memory of
the Confederacy had undergone significant change by the turn of
the century. Woman had moved from being the chief mourners to
being the chief custodians of the Memory of the Lost Cause under
the auspices of the United Daughters of the Confederacy. Caroline
Meriwether Goodlett of Nashville and Anna Davenport Raines of
Savannah are credited with being the founders of the U.D.C. in
1894.7 It had evolved from the local memorial associations
and veterans' auxiliaries. As the veterans died (estimates are
that survival rates of veterans in 1890-1910 were about forty-four
percent), it was their daughters who carried on the fight to preserve
the Memory of the Lost Cause.8 The U.D.C. was an organization
which gave women of the middle and upper class a domestic arena.
Members raised money for monuments, cared for needy veterans,
tended cemeteries and promoted textbooks which would tell the
war from the southern viewpoint.9 The rapid growth
of the U.D.C. was testament to its popularity. By 1900 there
were 17,000 members in 112 chapters. Ten years later, there were
44,000 members in 1014 chapters.10 The United Confederate
Veterans, the Sons of the Confederate Veterans, and the United
Daughters of the Confederacy shared the publication of the Confederate
Veteran magazine. During their 1895 convention, the United
Veterans of the Confederacy proposed building a series of monuments
to Confederate women, setting off a surprising round of controversy
which exploded in the pages of the Confederate Veteran.
General Irwin C. Walker of Charleston, South Carolina, led the
fight to have a monument erected in every state of the Old Confederacy.11
The ensuing debate revealed divisions between the U.C.V. and the
U.D.C. and within the U.D.C. itself. Since 1895, letters and
opinions had been sent to the Confederate Veteran
which suggested that the money would be better spent on practical
assistance to living women. Several correspondents suggested
a university for women.12 Others supported scholarships
for southern women. For instance, Sada Foute Richmond of Memphis
wrote in 1907 to support the establishment of an endowed scholarship
in each southern state to be called "The Southern Mothers
Scholarship" for "Southern girls of true Southern parentage
and ancestry." She stated, "This would prove Southern
chivalry has still the lead in civilization."13
Another writer suggested a building for southern female students
in New York to provide a "Dixie Home" in that northern
city.14
Women were proud of the roles that they and their mothers had
played during the war, but many were also mindful of the continuing
changes that the war had wrought in their lives. Many women were
forced to become self-supporting after the war. The 1870 Census
records many more women than men in the South, ranging from 1,000
more women than men in Mississippi to over 34,000 more women than
men in North Carolina.15 Many women entered teaching
and literary occupations out of necessity as well as personal
choice.16 And women were becoming increasingly involved
in progressive activities through missionary societies and clubs.
This disagreement over the most appropriate way to honor the memory
of the sacrifices that women had made during the war illustrates
conflicting versions of collective memory. As the veterans sought
to pay tribute to the ladies, they remembered how southern women
had endured hardships and had demonstrated compassion and strength
during the war. But many women in the South remembered not only
their past activism, but that it had been continued into the present.
![]() Source: Confederate Veteran |
had not a line of womanly grace or modesty or tenderness, not a hunt of the dear old home keeper and home builder of the southland, not a reminder of the sweet and gentle minister of mercy and comfort who bent over the hospital cot and soothed the pain of the wounded soldier and left in his heart of gratitude forever the true picture of that noblest of all memories of the Confederacy, the patient, self-sacrificing, unwearied helper and comforter of the boys in gray.17
![]() Author's photo |
It represents Fame supporting the wounded and exhausted Confederate soldier with her left arm while with her right hand she is placing a wreath upon the head of the Southern Woman, whose every nerve is vibrating with love and sympathy for the soldier and his cause, as expressed by the palm she is trying to place upon his breast, thoroughly unconscious that as her reward a crown is being placed upon her own head.18
Once again, the difference in these design illustrates competing
versions of collective memory. Once could postulate that the
veterans who chose the original design were still fighting the
war. The military posture of the female figure symbolically holding
a sword and flag indicates that they perceived the women as their
cohorts in battle. This reflects combat memories of veterans
who remembered the glory days of on the battlefield. Those who
favored the Kinney design remembered the roles of women not in
the fight, but in support of the fighters. It could also be said
to reflect the postwar roles that women continued to fill in their
support activities and as keepers of the cultural traditions.
In 1915, the Tennessee legislature appropriated the money to erect
the monument. Placed in a sunken garden on the grounds of the
Tennessee War Memorial, the bronze sculpture was finally dedicated
in a grand ceremony on October 10, 1926. Because of a steady
downpour, the ceremony, attended by about 800 people, was held
inside the War Memorial Auditorium. Participants included the
United Confederate Veterans, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Daughters
of the Confederacy, and Governor Austin Peay. The festivities
included several speeches and a volley in salute from the muskets
of six aged veterans.19 Another monument with the
same design is on the grounds of the state capitol in Mississippi.
In some way, the disagreements over the best way to commemorate
the contributions of southern women to the Civil War has parallels
to the controversy which raged when the Vietnam Memorial was proposed
for Washington, D.C. Again, the questions to be answered were:
How are memories best commemorated? Is a monument the best way
to do this? We have seen that many southern women preferred a
"living memorial" to a monument. In the Vietnam Memorial
controversy, the dispute was not over whether to build a monument,
but over what kind of monument should be erected. This leads
to the other fundamental question: Just whose memories are being
publicly commemorated? In the case of the monument to the Women
of the Confederacy, there were differences between the memories
of the veterans and the women. In the Vietnam Memorial there
was intense competition between those who wanted to commemorate
the patriotic aspects of the war and those who wanted to emphasize
the sense of loss engendered by the conflict. This competition
revealed different "collective memories" of the war.
In neither of these monument are the military and political issues
of the war being remembered.
![]() Author's photo |
Historian Michael Frisch points out that in English the noun "history"
has no corresponding verb. In contrast, the noun "memory"
presumes the active verb "to remember." There is a
leap across time from the "then of happening" to the
"now of recall."20 Perhaps this is the problem
with the setting for the monument. It was originally conceived
by and for those who actively remembered the war, but it has ceased
to be a vehicle for remembering and has become a static piece
of history. Additional information at the site, at the very least,
explaining the classical symbolism of the status would assist
modern viewers in interpreting.
James Mayo, in his examination of war memorials, supports the
assertion that while war memorials themselves may be preserved,
the society around them changes and to does its history. People
can simultaneously enhance, reinterpret, and forget various facets
of war history, and this leads to changes in the perceived meanings
of war memorials.21 The current status of the Tennessee
Monument to the Women of the Confederacy illustrates this process.
Although Kinney's design may have been an understandable symbolic
design for people who lived through the war and its aftermath,
it does not transcend generations. It is not understandable to
those who collective memories and familiarity with classical allegory
have changed. Sadly out of context with its present surroundings,
the Tennessee Monument to the Women of the Confederacy sits forlornly
in a Plaza which celebrates another fight, another set of collective
memories, and another need for healing in the aftermath of war.
1David Thelen, "Memory and American History,"
Journal of American History 75 (March 1989): 1122.
2Ibid., 1120.
3For an interesting perspective on Frederick Douglass's
fight to retain these issues in the national collective memory,
see David W. Blight, "For Something Beyond the Battlefield":
Frederick Douglass and the Struggle for the Memory of the Civil
War," Journal of American History 75 (March
1989): 1167.
4I.A. Newby, The South: A History (New
York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1978), 235. It is estimated
that a third of southern families lost a loved one.
5Stephen Davis, "Empty Eyes, Marble Hand: The
Confederate Monument and the South," Journal of Popular
Culture 16 (1982): 2.
6Gaines M. Foster, Ghosts of the Confederacy:
Defeat, the Lost Cause and the Emergence of the New South 1865
to 1913 (New York: Oxford UP, 1987),129.
7Angela Howard Zophy, ed., Handbook of American
Women's History (New York: Garland, 1970), 622.
8John Ruoff, "Southern Womanhood 1865-1920: An
Intellectual and Cultural Study" (Ph.D. diss., University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1976), 98.
9Foster 171-173. Membership requirements of local
chapters usually included recommendations from two present members
and dues of $1 which, in effect, eliminated most lower-class women.
Anne Firor Scott adds that many women, once involved in progressive
activities under the auspices of the U.D.C., went on to lead the
suffrage fight in the southern states.
10Zophy 622.
11"Concerning the Southern Women's Monument,"
Confederate Veteran 17 August 1909: 371-372.
12"Monument to Southern Women," Confederate
Veteran 2 January 1895: 22.
13Sada F. Richmond, "The Southern Mothers' Scholarship."
Confederate Veteran 15 August 1907: 351.
14Sallie F. Hunt, "Women Want Building for Monument."
Confederate Veteran 17 April 1908: 181.
15United States Census Office, A Compendium of
the Ninth Census, 1870 (1872, reprint Washington, D.C.:
Government Printing Office), 546.
16Anne Firor Scott, The Southern Lady: From
Pedestal to Politics 1830-1930 (Chicago: of Chicago, 1970),
118.
17H.M. Hamill, "Confederate Woman's Monument,"
Confederate Veteran 17 April 1909: 150.
18"Southern Women's Monument," Confederate
Veteran 17 July 1909, 312.
19Ibid.
20Michael H. Frisch, "The Memory of History,"
in Presenting the Past, ed. Susan Porter Benson,
Stephen Brier, Roy Rosenweig (Philadelphia: Temple 1986), 5-17.
21James Mayo, War Memorials as Political Landscape
(New York Praeger, 1988), 58-59.
This web page is maintained by
Border States On-Line is hosted by Georgetown College.
This page was last updated on 5/12/99. | Border States On-Line | Site Map
Dr. Harold D. Tallant, Department of History, Georgetown College
400 East College Street, Georgetown, KY 40324, (502) 863-8075
E-mail: htallant@georgetowncollege.edu