Popular Methodologies
of Today
~ Orff
~ Kodaly
~ Dalcroze
~ Suzuki
There follows some basic information concerning the life, times and
methodologies of Orff, Kodaly, Dalcroze and Suzuki. These are the four
primary methodologies which are utilized in the teaching of primary-age
students. Hopefully these notes will amplify and augment our in-class
discussions and provide a valuable resource for your future teaching
Carl Orff [1895-1982]
-German composer and pedagogue
introduced to the world a dynamic process which could ignite a fire in the
imaginations and fantasies of children, inviting them into the world of
music
-Orff did not set out to develop a program of music education
-Orff did not set out to develop special instruments for class
-Orff's work for schools the "Orff Schulwerk"
-began teaching in Munich in the 1920's at this time schools for training
teachers in gymnastics and dance were popular.
-Orff , influenced by the works of Dalcroze started the "Guntherschule" in
conjunction with dancer Dorothee Gunther
-combined the study of music with gymnastics/dance
-from this union, Orff would develop his unique concept of music education
-during World War II "Guntherschule" was destroyed
-after the war, government wanted Orff to focus on music ed
- began experimental classes at the Mozarteum in Salzburg
-developed five volumes of Musik for Kinder, became the core of the "Schulwerk"
-today the Orff Institute at Salzburg offers special training for teachers
from throughout the world
-Orff referred to his curriculum as elemental music pertaining to the
elements, primeval, basic -intended for learning to be through active
participation, movement, music and speech
-principal goal was to lead children to create their own music
Goal of "Orff-Style" Programs is the development of children who are
comfortable with music
-develop children who can play, improvise and create music
-pathway to this is with simple instruments
Essentially ...
~ everyone has a need to create/express
~ via simple instruments, pentatonic scale - success may be guaranteed
-as a composer - Carmina Burana, music for 1936 olympics, 1948 radio
programs began: children performing for children many, many listened to
the radio programs - need for instruments
-rise of Studio 49 [Klaus Becker, a cabinet maker by profession]
-based instruments on high quality Indonesian Gamelan excellent quality,
quality materials, very expensive-continued rise of the "Orff-Schulwerk"
The Instruments:
Very often, the Orff method is associated with the use of
percussion instruments. These are fundamental to the purposes and aims of
the Orff method, and often, these days are just called "Orff Instruments".
The main families of these instruments are divided into three primary
categories:
xylophones: wood bars
metallophones: metal bars
glockenspiel: metal bars
each of these categories is then divided into "voices": soprano, alto,
[tenor] bass
In addition
to these instruments, the following percussion instruments are used:
cymbals, triangles, wood blocks, jingle clogs etc. - sometimes a
single-barred instrument called the bordun [sometimes the actual drone
pattern is called the bordun also] is used for an ostinato pattern or
harmonic foundation.Bars are removable so only certain tones may be used
Orff, as with others starts: Sol-me, then adds - re, do, la
Primary Goals of Orff:
1. task of music education to lead students to improvise/compose
**this allows the students to develop thinking creatively
2. train teachers to provide opportunities for improvisation the "Schulwerk"
has basic guidelines and plans
3. rather than provide "set" examples students/teacher encouraged to:
experiment, manipulate and change musical materials
Summary:
1. feeling precedes understanding, need active participation
2. elemental approach: grow with growth
3. singing of pentatonic scales [sol-mi chants]
4. body movement: snapping, clapping, patschen and stamping
5. integration of singing, movement, playing instruments
6. use of well-designed instruments
7. development of the creativity in the student
Zoltan Kodaly [1882-1967]
Kodaly: Hungarian composer and musicologist - known for his choral works -
music education methodology named for him - goal was to strengthen the
music education of all Hungarians - Kodaly method was not invented, but
rather developed by ZK - took elements of:
solfege from Italy and from Dalcroze
rhythm syllables from Cheve of France
hand singing from Curwen of England
ZK did however, weave into one fabric which is named for him
Main Points:
- believed human voice was key to music education
- emphasized development of literacy through singing
- emphasized use of folk songs from own culture - "Mother Tongue" concept
- believed that music education should follow natural development of the
child
Lois Choksy, noted Kodaly authority summarizes ZK's basic philosophy:
a. music literacy is something everyone can and should enjoy
b. singing is the foundation of all music education
c. music education must begin with the very young
d. folk songs of one's own culture must be the vehicle for instruction
e. only music of the highest artistic value should be used
The work of Zoltan Kodaly has greatly influenced the Hungarian public,
with an unusual amount of musical ensembles and groups flourishing
throughout the country. Singing is widely respected and oft-done. Today
there are more than 150 singing schools in Hungary and the use of the
Kodaly method and principles have spread to Japan, New Zealand, Australia,
Africa, most of Europe and North and South America. One of the best known
facets of the Kodaly method is the hand signs which are based on the
principles of Curwen.
Emile
Jaques-Dalcroze [1865‑1950]
All of the methodologies [i.e. Orff, Kodaly, Dalcroze or Suzuki] should be
viewed as "tools" for our teaching. Essentially each approach is striving
to broaden the musical horizons of students as they have meaningful
experiences with and about music. Skills in performing, creating and
listening to music are pivotal to these four approaches. As you grow and
develop, you will hopefully choose an eclectic approach for your teaching,
drawing from these methodologies freely. In many cases, the finest
teachers have always followed these methodologies, without even knowing
the name of Orff, Kodaly, etc.
EJD was a Swiss educator who developed a music curriculum which included
eurhythmics, solfege and improvisation. These facets were designed to aid
the development of muscular sense, the inner ear and a form of creative
expression. It was the goal of Dalcroze to find ways which would help his
students develop their abilities to feel, hear, invent, sense and imagine,
connect, remember, read, write, perform and interpret music.
EJD was educated at Swiss and Viennese conservatories and gained a sound,
traditional musical background. His mother was a Pestalozzian music
teacher, and without doubt, this influenced ways in which EJD would
eventually move. At age 25, EJD was appointed professor of harmony and
solfege at the Conservatory of Music in Geneva. This was his first contact
with a large number of students and he quickly discovered that though many
of the students were technically advanced on their instruments, they were
unable to feel and express music. They were unable to deal with the
simplest rhythmic problems and often their sense of pitch and tonality was
faulty. He subsequently spent the rest of his life discovering ways which
he could facilitate his students' learnings and understanding about music.
EJD always tried to move away from the dullness and boredom of
"disconnected" musical learning.
Unlike Kodaly who was a "weaver" of the elements of others [i.e. hand
signs from Curwen of England, rhythm syllables from Cheve of France, etc.]
Dalcroze was forging new ground for his students at nearly every turn. His
teachers included Faure and Bruckner. He discovered in his work that the
students themselves were the instruments; not voices, or pianos, or
trumpets, etc. He became convinced that through responsiveness of the
entire body, a true "feeling" of music could be taught. He also discovered
that though some young students were unable to tap or keep a steady beat,
that they, were however, able to walk or run in tempo. This became a
hallmark of his innovative teaching methodology.
The hallmarks of the complete Dalcroze method are:
a. Eurhythmics
b. Solfege
c. Improvisation
Eurhythmics is Greek for "good rhythm": there are four types:
- follow
- quick reaction
- interrupted canon
- canon:
Dalcroze Activities and Methodology
Of great import to these methods are moving and singing as basic skills
...
Inner Hearing:
the ability to internalize feelings of movement and sound
Kinesthesia:
the sensation of movement is converted into feelings which is then sent to
the brain, which converts information to knowledge
EJD's "Thirty‑Four Elements of Rhythm":
[i.e. time‑space‑energy‑weight‑balance; regular beats; tempo; nuances of
tempo; dynamics; nuances of dynamics; articulations; accents; measure;
duration; etc.]
EJD's "Movement Vocabulary"
Movements in Place
examples: clapping, nodding, snapping, etc
Movements in Space
examples: skipping, walking, running, etc
Totality of Movement Experience: [clapping example on slow beat]
a. preparation
inhale/lifting of arms away from body/prep beat
b. attack
the instant of clapping hands together/exhale
c. prolongation
pulling hands apart to feel and measure kinesthetically the beat
d. return to preparation
lifting arms outwards/inhale for recycle of energy
Two Dalcroze‑Like Exercises
Exercise One: Dynamics: [Follow]
needs: class members, drum, beater, movement vocabulary
Step One:
instructor indicates that speaking will be minimal, asks the class to
follow what the instructor does‑instructor starts to walk around the
classroom, moderate tempo, moderate‑well‑placed steps, hands folded [as
if praying] ensures everyone is on board: then at same tempo, stomp feet,
hands outstretched‑palms outward, make sure everyone is on board, then at
same tempo, tip‑toe, bend down‑crouch, cross arms, then at same tempo,
resume original stance, regular step, hands folded.
Step Two:
instructor picks up drum and beater, asks the class to listen, and respond
to music with appropriate gestures from the three possible options. review
motion options, very important to maintain the steady beat/pulse, then
begin, at first use the same order as was originally taught, then vary as
necessary.
Exercise Two: 4/4 versus 3/4 [Quick reaction]
needs: class members, piano, movement vocabulary
Step One:
instructor with minimal language, indicates 4/4 conducting pattern and 3/4
conducting pattern, with class in place, example on blackboard perhaps,
ensure that everyone is onboard, then have everyone follow instructor
walking in circle as they count beats, use both 4/4 and 3/4, start on left
foot, always extra stomp on down beat, ensure that everyone is on board,
keep steady tempo, then add conducting patterns to the walking, keeping
the emphasis on the down beat, make sure everyone is on board, then
explain they are going to have to listen to the piano and "quickly react"
with appropriate motion to what they are going to hear.
Step Two:
review the movement vocabulary, then keeping a steady beat start playing
on the piano a blues progression in b flat, then at some juncture change
to waltz feel, using b flat/f oom‑pah‑pah feel, make sure everyone is on
board, then explain once again that the students should respond to what
they hear, alternate patterns.
Shinichi Suzuki
Background: Suzuki's father owned a violin factory, and as a
boy he learned about violins and how to play them. His study also included
eight years of training in Berlin in the 1920's. Prior to WW II Suzuki
with his three brothers formed a string quartet which performed actively
in Japan. Suzuki was also involved in teaching activities during this
time. During the course of the WW II the family violin factory was
destroyed. Following the war, Suzuki turned his attention to teaching.
Little is known, or attention was given to his efforts in the late 1940's
and early 1950's. Some reports of his amazing program was brought to the
attention of the world at large by Pablo Casals, eminent cellist, he went
to Japan to study with and visit with Suzuki.
In 1958, his amazing accomplishments as a teacher were first
presented in this country at a meeting of the American String Teachers
Association at the Oberlin Conservatory. At this time a film was shown of
approximately 750 Japanese children playing Bach's Concerto for Two Violins.
The following year, John Kendall, who became a noted authority on the Suzuki
method traveled to Japan to see Suzuki at work. It was in 1965 [not 1964 as
reported in the Hoffer Text] when Suzuki and ten of his students were
presented at the National MENC Convention in Philadelphia. The students
ranged from the ages of 10‑14. The impact of their performance was
astounding, as none had ever heard players at such a young age play so
musically and so well. At this point, the saga of Suzuki generally becomes
very well known.
In the last three decades hundreds of Suzuki workshops have been held
displaying and explaining the method. Numerous performances have been staged
of extremely young students performing at an unbelievable level on the
violin. The method has also been transferred to piano, as well as other
instruments, and the ideas of Suzuki have been very influential to our
profession for some years. As with all methods, there are some "true"
believers and some "skeptics". Points for and against will be illuminated.
Basic Influences:
a. Pestalozzi
1. teach sounds before signs
2. lead student to observe by hearing/imitating/comparing
b. mother‑tongue concept
1. native language learned through imitation
2. only after extensive vocabulary‑ written symbols
Basic Concepts:
a. instruction done within the family unit - all instruction done
together/nurturing
b. start at an early age - exposure to good recordings - violin instruction
(3) or younger - stringed instruments come in 1/4, 1/2, sizes
c. basic method is rote imitation - students hear/then attempt to imitate
d. all music performed is memorized - reading music not an issue at first
e. all learning is done thoroughly - absolute attention given to detail
Basic Advantages:
a. incredible ability level possibilities
b. exposure to excellent music at an early age
c. work of family unit together
Basic Concerns:
a. too much emphasis put on rote imitation
b. learning notational system much too late
c. American family differs from Japanese
d. general cultural differences