
A Twanger Evaluation Rubric
[to help with your understanding of the
evaluation of Twanger Assignments (TA)]
|
Example |
|||||
|
|
0-5 |
6-10 |
11-15 |
16-20 |
21-25 |
|
assignment not turned in, poor fundamental writing, misses the point of the topic, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mechanics of writing weak, limited, basic understanding of the topic, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
addresses the topic in a fundamental and accurate manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shows understanding and accurately addresses the topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shows a high degree of reflective thinking and addresses the topic fully |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Thinking Paradigm [and this rubric and your assignments will be evaluated within the context of the Universal Intellectual Standards including: clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth and logic] |
|||||